Last updated: 24th July 2024
In our recent webinar, ‘Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS) 101’, which is available to watch now on-demand, our attendees posed a variety of questions relating to damp and mould and their responsibilities under the HHSRS. Our experts have answered and compiled these questions to give you a comprehensive understanding of the rating system and common questions seen within the sector.
A: Your requirement to conduct an HHSRS assessment aligns with the Decent Homes Standard; therefore, it should be integrated into your Stock Condition Survey. Ideally, these assessments should be carried out every five years as part of your routine maintenance. However, if a tenant reports a hazard at any time before the scheduled assessment, it's crucial to conduct an HHSRS inspection to address the identified hazard, rather than waiting for the next Stock Condition Survey.
The responsibility is on you as landlords to understand the risks and issues with your properties. The Housing Ombudsman, Regulator of Social Housing, and guidance on damp and mould states that even if a tenant isn’t contacting you, you should be proactively reaching out rather than neglecting the properties that don’t cause any problems.
There are two approaches to conducting HHSRS assessments: indicative and fully scored.
The scoring differs depending on each hazard, meaning whilst damp and mould is often visible and easier to score, other issues such as missing handrails on stairs might require more attention to detail. Frontline staff visiting properties should not necessarily be expected to score these issues but should have the knowledge to recognise problems and report them promptly to the appropriate channels.
A: The hazard profiles that include the baseline averages are contained within the operating guidance itself and can be downloaded from the government website.
A: The HHSRS review has detailed the hazards that will be changing, and you can find updates on the government website. The update will mean a number of the hazards will be combined so none of them will be entirely removed.
To discover more on the upcoming HHSRS review, catch up on our webinar, 'Preparing for Change: HHSRS, Damp, Mould, and Condensation', available on-demand now.
A: HHSRS is a module that forms part of a Stock Condition Survey. The data collected from both the Stock Condition Survey and the HHSRS is used to inform the Decent Homes calculation for the property based on four criteria. Damp and Mould Surveys would typically be a separate service which looks specifically at damp and mould, not the full property like a Stock Condition Survey.
If you require guidance with any area of your HHSRS or specific damp and mould compliance, get in touch with one of our experts to book your Damp and Mould Survey or Stock Condition Survey, tailored to your property’s requirements.
Despite this, damp and mould is a symptom, not the defect itself. A small patch of mould should act as an early warning sign that there’s an issue that needs to be addressed and should never be left to get worse even if you score it as a category 2 hazard.
Q: We complete assessments with an HHSRS score for damp and mould, we also treat the mould on the day, if possible. Once the mould has been treated would that then mean we have reduced the HHSRS score?
A: In the guidance, the damp and mould hazard itself is centred around mould (fungal growth) and the increased presence of house dust mites. Within the guidance, house dust mites are determined as the bigger risk associated with damp and mould. Meaning that although you have removed mould (a symptom) you have not reduced the risk because the underlying issue is still there, and there is still an increased house dust mite population. Therefore, it may look better, but you haven't significantly changed the score. Also, as you score based on the vulnerable group over the next 12 months, the mould will come back within 12 months if you don't fix the underlying cause, meaning the score will stay the same.
Q: If a non-technical person reports a hazard, is it good enough to raise remedial works to a contractor, or should a technical professional re-visit to do a further inspection scoring under the HHSRS?
A: It would depend, but if the defect is clearly a hazard, then raising the remedial work straight from this non-technical view is fine. However, depending on what the hazard is, you may want a technical professional to visit to ensure the remedial work will remove or reduce the risk to an acceptable level. Our experts are on hand if you need help assessing the hazard following remedial works. Get in touch.I would also suggest whoever visits should take photos to ensure you have an evidence trail of the hazard when you are initially made aware of it.
To ensure you’re up to date on inspecting damp and mould, we would advise acting on stock condition data month by month to stay compliant with new regulations. Lessons learnt from working with organisations show clients falling foul for not taking action on data they’ve received. To address this, creating teams dedicated to addressing and remediating damp and mould cases would be beneficial. These teams can be dedicated to receiving category surveys to stay on top of the stock condition data and manage the workload each month.
Q: Regarding mould/condensation, we currently carry out mould wash and redecoration where mould is found. However, this will not generally stop the cause of the mould growth, especially if we have already installed PIV, etc. What do you think the timescales for other more extensive works (improved insulation) to prevent the cause of condensation/mould will be?
A: If you have works that would fall into the category of extensive and cannot be completed within the timeframes directed by Awaab’s Law, then unfortunately there is no acceptable timescale. As a landlord, you would have to demonstrate you acted reasonably for each individual case. This in itself will vary case by case, and the only person who can confirm whether you acted reasonably is a judge. This may change with some case law, but there isn't a bar to work towards currently. In this situation, you need to remedy this as soon as practicably possible.
To discover more about the upcoming timescales under Awaab’s Law and your next steps, head over to our dedicated blog, ‘Awaab’s Law: What to expect’.
Q: Before carrying out any damp and mould remediation work, is an asbestos report required?
A: This depends on the property, its age (pre-1999), and the work being undertaken. Caution should always be taken when undertaking any work that may damage or disturb asbestos. If there is any suspected asbestos, a survey should always be undertaken before completing work that may damage it. This would be the same for any piece of work, not just damp and mould remediation.If you require an asbestos survey before carrying out damp and mould remediation work, get in touch with one of our experts.
Q: If a customer has decided to cap their gas and not heat their home, this may create damp and mould and increase the risk to the customer. Is this regarded as a category 1 hazard (and reported as non-decent) even though no defect may be identified?
A: It's a complex question that doesn’t necessarily have a straightforward answer. To calculate things like damp and mould and excessive cold, you ignore the existing tenant. This means your scoring is based on there being a fully functioning heating system in place; for any inspection, you wouldn’t know to what extent the heating is used so you wouldn’t take this into consideration. It does need to be taken into consideration when taking remedial action on damp and mould, for example.In broader terms, the sector, particularly the Regulator of Social Housing, expects you to do more for your tenants. For HHSRS it wouldn’t be an issue with scoring, but for your wider obligations as a landlord, you will be expected to work with that tenant to see if you can help. It is no longer acceptable to leave a tenant without heating because either they requested it, or you capped it for other reasons.
Q: Is a tenant who is known to be disabled (and their increased risk/potential for injury) covered within the vulnerable group and associated scoring?
A: Not for the purposes of scoring HHSRS. For HHSRS, you score based on the identified vulnerable group for the associated risk. Despite this, you do have a wider obligation outside of the HHSRS; for example, Awaab’s Law will apply to the existing tenant and their associated vulnerabilities/disabilities would have to be considered. Damp and mould guidance from the government requires you to take into consideration the specific tenants living there at the time.Each case would have to be taken on its own merit, and the only person that can give you the legal right to do this is a judge. Until case law is established, we don’t know what that bar would look like. As an organisation, it’s your job to act reasonably and be able to provide evidence of this.
Q: For customers where there is support needed and access is not provided for carrying out improvement work. What steps can we take to mitigate fulfilling landlords’ responsibility?
A: Your access process for HHSRS or any hazard identified within a property should be as robust as your compliance access policy, like gas. This approach will be different for all landlords, but access should be robust, and as a final stage, legal access should be considered. When you’re trying to gain access, you’re acting reasonably, and the tenant is generally not, if something happens during this period you should be able to demonstrate you acted reasonably.Q: Are you able to carry out Stock Condition Surveys without using Keystone?
A: Yes, we do operate on other systems when undertaking this survey.Q: Do regulations state certain roles must have HHSRS training?
Q: Is a damaged garden fence considered a health and safety issue? If so, is the landlord or letting agency obliged to fix it and what is the timescale?
A: None of the HHSRS hazards directly cover garden fences; however, it could become a factor in other hazards. Security, for example, does mention fencing as it is a deterrent, however, just because the fencing is broken or isn't there would not make this hazard automatically a category 1. If the fencing is dangerous or poses a risk to anyone, then you do have a duty under various legislation, such as the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, to take action so that it no longer poses that risk.